The President of the STJ hinders the increase in salaries in the STF for Guides, claims that the binding effect is a parachute



Justice Minister João Otávio de Noronha, on Tuesday, advocated future Economy Minister Paulo Guedes, raised the salary of the federal supreme court (STF) and stressed that the criticism of the coupling effect of adaptation is a "parachute".

In a conversation with the journalists after lunch, which was also attended by STF President Dias Toffoli and the Union Court of Justice (José Múcio and Raimundo Carreiro – Noronha), he confirmed that Guedes first pointed out against the increase but stressed that he did not "have much information, clarity of information that we gave today. "

"I have shown him that this binding business is a parachute, it really does not exist … The Constitution only binds the Supreme Court to higher courts … there are 90 judges, each state has to make its law on remuneration," he said.

"You can not want to transfer the problems of states to the Union, and the state must be responsible if the budget is not the condition for the increase it does not give, it is the responsibility of each of them, they have to assume their responsibilities, each of them must assume their role in this republic. stand behind one and blame the Supreme Court, "he added.

He said he did not want Guedes to persuade him to increase, but only to clarify. And he admitted that in his place, as Minister of Economy, he would not want to spend too much.

The proposed increase of 16.38 percent in salaries of FTS ministers to 39.3 thousand. Real costs will amount to total additional expenditures of CZK 4 billion in 2019, according to calculations of budgetary consultations of the Chamber of Deputies and the Senate.

According to the survey, the Union will have an impact of 1.4 billion real and 2.6 billion real countries if this increase is approved. Prognoses for states take into account the cascade effect observed with state accounting courts, the state administration, the public prosecutor's office, and state prosecutors.

But Noronha argued that "it's not like it's going up and everybody has to go up," and he stressed that any adjustments must be made by law. He also stressed that the budget would have no impact, as the adjustment of these new expenditures should be adjusted under the ceiling rule. In practice, this means that other spending should be curtailed to provide room for adjustment.

"So it will not mean additional spending in 2019," Noronha said. Despite the defense advocacy, he said he had no expectations of a sanction or a raise in salary by President Michel Temer.

The question of ending housing assistance for the judiciary as a means of compensating salary adjustments for Supreme Court ministers also said that "today's purpose is finally" an advantage, but that it will be up to the Supreme Court to investigate this matter.

Reuters
Reuters – This publication, including information and data, is copyrighted by Reuters. It is explicitly forbidden to use it or its name without the prior authorization of Reuters. All rights reserved.


Source link