Tuesday , June 18 2019
Home / canada / Do not work 80 hours a week for Elon Musk or for everyone

Do not work 80 hours a week for Elon Musk or for everyone



The good signal that your boss is full of shit is when they promise to "change the world."

In general, this sales point is based on a fairly new American ideology that you have – yes, you! – You are a unique and special creature, and therefore deserve a job that is meaningful and brings value to the world. But coming from the technology sector – where such thinking has penetrated to the very point of parody – is trained in the midst of a legitimate reality that new technology he does bring change, though not always for the better. Mostly, however, it appears to serve only as a defensive mechanism used by those who justify their own excessive salaries and lifestyle.

Which brings us to the recent announcement of Elon Musko about what he is looking for in the working class:

Musk would continue later tweet "If you love what you are doing, it (mostly) does not feel like work," specifications while the ideal working time varies from person to person, what he is looking for is "about 80 permanent, culminating more than 100 occasional."

To begin with, the idea that working with such a clock is useful is at best objectively dubious: The analysis by Stanford Economist John Pencanvel in 2014 evaluates the data from the First World War and recent literature to the conclusion that it exceeds 50 hours a week leads to decreasing revenue and can actually reduce performance. Further studies – not to mention the federal government's warning about health and well-being – also suggest that work all the time is bad and bad for you. In fact, the revision of the relevant data files in 2017 CUNY, the 2005 study on the detection of a 60-hour work week, resulted in a 23% increase in the level of threat to the workplace.

But Musk is clever. He does not talk about it that kind of efficiency. He talks about maximizing what he, the $ 24 billion man, spends on his own labor.



Here is what I think it actually says: I want to consolidate my inheritance and thus my wealth and value for society by changing the world of technology. To do so, I will need your help and I am prepared to pay a predetermined wage or salary. But when you are here, I will try to pull you off from your work by selling you the idea that you too will change the world. And if you do not help, I'll find someone who's going to be.

It's like every boss, really. The boss wants to make money by doing something, and he'll pay you to help him get there. But in this system, he will always try to pay you as little as possible because it will allow him to keep more money. (He may be investing in a company, maybe just buy a ship – if it is private capital, it is probably the other.) When this contract is blocked due to a contract, it will try to get another bang for its buck by constantly blurring the line between "working" domestic "life. It will get you in a few hours, bring you to your smartphone or give you tasks that were not basically what you signed up for.

The ultimate dream of every boss is to get one of his laborers to believe that they are part of something bigger that the project is worth sacrificing without having to give them any share in the ownership of society. Utopia is for the world, but the profits are for him.

It is really a question of asking what "change of the world" even means by the way. Greener transport by Tesla vehicles (and the charging device) could help people keep the world for a long time without completely destroying the planet, which is nice and good. But it also probably represents a sort of lame escape valve from the capitalist drive toward the consumption of global resources. Seemingly green technologies like this often appear to be more focused than anything else to feel less guilty than you, let's say, manage every day and work. And while SpaceX is "cold" in an uneven exploration of the universe, it is likely that tourism will be effective for the ultra-rich until it (possibly) gets into a series of escape pods from a dying planet. (Musk insisted it was not.)

Imagine what a "change" of your personal world might mean. Can less hours work positively affect its quality? Would you be able to spend more time in your limited existence on other activities such as reading, writing, playing with your children, getting to know the world or perhaps your own surroundings, improving the quality of life? Probably! Still, Musk is not trying to sell its potential workforce because it is not even the world that is trying to build on its technological capabilities. (Imagine you came back to the 1930s and told someone about all the technological inventions we did, and then watch their face fall when you let them know how many hours people still have to work. If you accidentally told legendary British economist John Maynard Keynes, he would squint you over your face.)

Realistically, no matter how Musk reaches him during his life by teaching his rent assistance in the production of various technical items, there will be less change in the world than what those who fought and died for an eight-hour working day and a 40 hour working week, reached. You know, those people in the trade union or who want to join one, the Musk people have long laughed and been repeatedly accused of targeting reprisals – a.k.a. busting trade unions. People like these people have legally changed the material conditions of life around the world so that Musk or any boss never gets it.

The most criminal of all, probably visionary minds like Musk, could never dream of such a change.

Sign up for our newsletter to get the best of VICE delivered to your inbox daily.

Watch Rick Paulas Twitter.

This article originally appeared on VICE USA.


Source link