The House Democrats will hold their first Medicare hearing on all legislation on Tuesday, proposing an extensive proposal to embrace several prominent presidential hopes for democratic presidents in 2020 – though some progressive prudent behavior may be a "farce" and President Trump and top republicans call the idea of a socialist prescription for disaster.
The Rule Committee meeting of 10:00 is about the 2019 Medicare for All, which promises to provide coverage quickly to "all people in the US". within two years according to the current bill and a summary published by Washington Representative Democrat Pramila Jayapal.
"I am proud to announce this historic Medicare for All legislation hearing," said committee chairman James P. McGovern, D-Mass. "Over the years, we have made tremendous progress in expanding healthcare, especially through the issue of Affordable Care Act. We have more work to do, and that's why I'm a proud co-creator of this law. A serious proposal that deserves serious consideration for Capitol Hill when we work on general coverage.
Legislation has provided support to more than 100 congress sponsors, including New York Rep. Alexandrai Ocasio-Cortez and Minnesota Rep. Ilhan Omar. Presidential candidates Pete Buttigieg, Cory Booker, Kamala Harris, Kirsten Gillibrand, Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren supported a version of the proposal, while Amy Klobuchar instead supported only the public option.
MCCONNELL CAN BE "GRIM REAPER" FOR DOCTOR FOR ALL IN THE SENATE
Some progressive, however, is concerned about Tuesday's hearing will have a little more than "theatrical reasoning" billing that Wendell Primus, the top House Speaker Advisor Nancy Pelosi, has been involved in planning hearings. In February, Primus reportedly told insurance managers not to worry about the Democrats advocating this proposal.
However, Congress Democrats have strongly pushed these claims and said only the Rules Committee – not the spokesperson's office or anyone else in the leadership of the Democratic Party – has the final decision on the proceedings, and that the hearing is designed to quickly but thoroughly consider Medicare for everyone.
But Democrats have expressed skepticism about legislation. Pelosi, for example, said he's personally "agnostic" on Medicare for All, and openly thought in a February interview with Rolling Stone, "How do you pay for it?"
Republicans invited Charles Blahouse, a senior researcher at the Mercatus Center at George Mason University, as a witness on Tuesday to answer this exact question. Blahous is the author of a study that found that the plan would increase government health care spending by $ 32.6 trillion over 10 years, leading to an increase in historical taxes.
These tax increases, which Blahous found, would only cost about $ 2 trillion. Blahous later accused Ocasio-Cortez of misinterpreting his study to try to argue that Medicare for All would save money.
The Republicans also invited the Galena Institute of President Grace-Marie Turner to testify. Turner warned last month about the possible consequences: "Everyone would have to give up the coverage he has now, including 173 million Americans who have health insurance at work, and taxes would be much higher to finance $ 32 trillion. They added government spending in the next decade. By comparison, federal revenue last year was $ 3.4 trillion.
In a statement, House Energy and Commerce Republican leader Greg Walden characterized Medicare for everyone as an expensive, inefficient solution to a real problem.
"Healthcare is deeply personal – affecting every American," Walden said. “Patients and families want more choice and control over their doctors, treatments, and coverage. They want lower costs and better access to care. But governance, one-size-all-health care is not the answer. The Democrats' Plan is Socialism. According to their plan, Americans will have fewer options, taxes would soar and access to care would slow down crawl. "
KAMALA HARRIS DISMISSES CONCERNS OVER MEDICARE FOR ALL: "NOT ABOUT COST"
Democrats have invited several witnesses, including economist Dean Baker, doctor of Farzone Nahvi, founder of ALS Hero Ada Barkan.
But the Huffington Post noted that "Medicare for all attorneys can actually be fine," because some Democrat witnesses do not explicitly support Medicare for All.
"How do you pay for it?"
One anonymous individual, who was proposed as a witness to the Rules Committee, but refused, wondered if the hearing would simply be a "farce" designed to defend the Affordable Care Act, rather than advance Medicare for everyone.
With the current Republican majority in the Senate, the proposal does not have the chance to pass at this point. In an interview with Fox News earlier this month, Senate leader Mitch McConnnell, R-Ky, promised to be a "grim frog" of ideas like Medicare for All and Green New Deal if he was in office. McConnell's re-election in 2020.
Tuesday's meeting comes on Monday after a report by Medicare and Social Security government inspectors, who found that the financial situation of government programs for central and working American pension schemes remains uncertain when Medicare pointed to insolvency by 2026. .
Legal Representative Jayapal said in his statement that health care costs are unsustainable: "There is no other developed country on Earth that has a healthcare system that is as fragmented and costly as ours." Health outcomes and barriers to care in America are the worst of any industrialized state. Healthcare is a human right and I am proud that the Rules Committee will hold this hearing on the subject of Medicare for All Act, as this majority discusses ways to strengthen our health care system for all.
White House spokesperson Sarah Sanders has limited her comments to Medicare and said Monday's report – the three heads of cabinet and the acting Social Security Commissioner – underlines the need for "serious" legislators to work with the administration on bilateral changes at a lower cost, eliminate fraud and abuse and preserve the program for future generations.
CLICK TO GET FOX NEWS APP
Sanders also took the opportunity to criticize Democrats' calls for Medicare expansion. She argued that such a move would mean a "total government takeover of health care" that would eliminate the private sector's potential, jeopardize elderly access to healthcare, and further burden the federal budget.
This issue is to become a key issue in the 2020 election, with the Associated Press exploratory research center NORC Center for Public Affairs Research, which found that support for Medicare for All is predominantly concentrated among democrats – not independent, who may have the key to doing so White House.
However, the study found that Democrats have the advantage of 17 percentage points over Republicans in Americans, who trust more to manage health care, 40% to 23%. This is comparable to the public more evenly distributed, on which several other major national policy areas, including economy, immigration and foreign affairs, would be better dealt with.
Fox News Chad Pergram and the Associated Press have contributed to this report.